The ruling says Cox didn’t provide a service dedicated to copyright infringement; it ‘simply provided internet access.’
The ruling says Cox didn’t provide a service dedicated to copyright infringement; it ‘simply provided internet access.’
by Emma RothMar 25, 2026, 5:03 PM UTCEmma Roth is a news writer who covers the streaming wars, consumer tech, crypto, social media, and much more. Previously, she was a writer and editor at MUO.
The Supreme Court has issued its ruling in a lengthy copyright battle between Cox Communications and major record labels, determining that the cable and internet service provider isn’t responsible for illegally
→ Continue reading at The Verge
